18th August 2002 - The
Mail on Sunday
The season of lies and emotional blackmail is here again.
Anyone who dares doubt that A-level standards are really rising is damned
as a cruel bully for upsetting teenagers who have worked so hard for their
devalued chits. Ministers insist exams have not got easier against all
the evidence from employers and universities that many students can barely
spell or count. Some of them even need remedial courses in subjects where
they have scored such superb grades.
Why can't Labour be honest about this?
Partly it's because it cannot be honest about anything. This Government
has a natural instinct to lie because it survives by concealing its real
purpose from the voters.
But there is a more pressing and more frightening reason. Labour is trying
to abolish the old British middle class.
A proper middle class is self-reliant, hard to fool and naturally conservative.
All free countries have several million such people. They are the foundation
of liberty under the law.
By middle class, I don't just mean white-collar workers and the well-off.
I mean the vast 'respectable' working class as well. It has nothing to
do with snobbery, everything to do with education, hard work, family life,
thrift and self-discipline.
The old school system of selection and tough exams was swelling that middle
class and helping them to use their talents to the full as never before.
By the mid-Sixties, the children of the poor were storming into Oxford
and Cambridge on their own merits.
The stupid class distinctions of pre-war Britain were collapsing. Look
at the biographies of many of our age's most
successful people and you will find they went to selective grammar schools
which have since ceased to exist.
At about this time, the Labour Party began to attack those schools. It
rightly pointed out that those who failed to get into good grammars went
to low-grade secondary moderns.
But instead of improving the bad secondary moderns, it wrecked
the good grammar schools. Experts knew perfectly well that this would
lower standards. One of the chief advocates of comprehensives, Sir Graham
Savage, admitted this as long ago as 1928.
Labour was worried about politics, not education. It saw the grammars
as nurseries of future Tony voters and obstacles to socialism, as indeed
they were.
Rather than let that continue, it was prepared to smash up hundreds of
the best free schools in the world.
Ever since it did this, exam standards and university entrance levels
have had to be lowered year by year to cover up the wretched truth.
And so it will go on, until everyone passes all their A-levels at A-grade,
everyone goes to university and everyone is so ignorant that they all
vote to join the euro.
|